Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Samuel Lazarus's avatar

Appreciate you challenging the status quo. Would love to know what you actually think versus knowing what you've prompted into an AI LLM. Example of rhetorical cadence that's a dead giveaway you didn't write this:

"Independents should expect straight answers, not party talking points. Soft Democrats should expect someone who will listen, argue in good faith, and explain every vote like you’re an equal, not a prop and definitely not an enemy."

This is the exact rhetorical structure of how an LLM thinks and writes. Between that and the constant AI-generated art.....it'll be hard to take you seriously until you deign to actually express yourself vs telling a machine to do it for you.

Shared with respect of course.

No posts

Ready for more?